0
English 1b3 Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Relative Clause vs Absolute Clause

Could you please tell me if you accept this and if not why?

a There were two parcels, one which was at reception, and the other which was lost.

To make it sound like I know what I'm talking about, I'll slide in some terminology...

I see the italicised clauses as absolute clauses/phrases, and thus see nothing wrong witht this sentence. Cool Breeze has told me he doesn't like it, but for reasons I can't quite understand.

And here are some alternative versios, which I believe are also correct:

b There were two parcels, one at reception, and the other lost.

c There were two parcels, one being at reception, and the being other lost.

d There were two parcels, one of which was at reception, and the other of which was lost.
  

Top answer

>>> I am not a grammarian nor a linguist. Based on my learning and understanding, and for what it is worth, this is my two cents: There were two parcels, one of which was at the reception ; and the other one was lost . In my opinion, "which" already infers the two parcels, so there is no need for the second "which".

  • >>> I am not a grammarian nor a linguist.
  • Based on my learning and understanding, and for what it is worth, this is my two cents: There were two parcels, one of which was at the reception ; and the other one was lost .
  • In my opinion, "which" already infers the two parcels, so there is no need for the second "which".
  • " a noun clause that functions as an adverbial clause.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
<<< There were two parcels, one which was at reception, and the other which was lost.>>>

I am not a grammarian nor a linguist. Based on my learning and understanding, and for what it is worth, this is my two cents:



There w

Related Questions