0
Eddie88 Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Relative clause sentence.

After four years of college, if there is one thing now, for which I am happier than getting the diploma, it is the fact that I met her".


1)Do you think this is non restrictive or restrictive? In other words, should there be a comma between 'now' and 'for'?

2)I realsie that this a relative clause, but the preposition has gone to its correct place before its object. Because of this, could you also call it a prepositional clause since a prepposition does begin the clause just like a prep begins a prep phrase?

P.s. Once again, I'm sorry for the ugly sentence; he is a foreign student. But I think it is a good enough sentence for the questions I am asking.

Thanks a lot.
  

Top answer

Hi Eddie, It's a restrictive clause and as such it is not punctuated properly. After four years of college, if there is one thing [that] I am happier about than getting the diploma , it is the fact that I met her. After four years of college, if there is one thing about which I am happier than getting the diploma , it is the fact that I met her.

  • Hi Eddie, It's a restrictive clause and as such it is not punctuated properly.
  • After four years of college, if there is one thing [that] I am happier about than getting the diploma , it is the fact that I met her.
  • After four years of college, if there is one thing about which I am happier than getting the diploma , it is the fact that I met her.
  • -- I would never say or write this, but it's also correct.
  • " However, no one would ever mistake what it's modifying (No one will say "What?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Hi Eddie,

It's a restrictive clause and as such it is not punctuated properly.
After four years of college, if there is one thing [that] I am happier about than getting the diploma, it is the fact that I met her.

After four years of college, if there is one thing about which I am happier than getting the diploma, it is the fact that I met her. -- I
0
Hi,

I would agree that the preposition 'about' makes more sense than 'for'.

And perhaps the misplaced modify is one of the main reasons it sounds like a terrible sentence.

It's a restrictive clause and as such it is not punctuated properly.

How is it not punctuated correctly? Do you mean that you think it is a restrictive clause and therefore no comma is
0
Hi again,

Yes, you should NOT set off a restrictive clause with commas. The commas are used to set off what is additional information and does not identify "which one."

My house, which has a view of the river, cost less than his new car. -- This is just exta information about the house.

My house that has a view of the river cost less than his new car. -- This tells you
0
Hi,

I'm aware of punctuation with restrictive and non restrictive clause. I just thought you were omitting the comma for some other reason. But I now realise we're on the same page.

Thanks for noticing the misplaced modifier! I will generally pick them up in my own writing, but I don't always pick it up in others, especially in poor sentences.

Thanks.

Related Questions