0
Desafinado Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

relative clause

I was corrected my sentence as follows. I would like to know why the thing is better than what,here.

She talked about what her job was like and how useful what she learnt at our company was.
She talked about what her job was like and how useful the things what she learnt at our company were.
  

Top answer

The first sentence is grammatical; the second is not. It should be …how useful the things that she learnt at our company were.

  • The first sentence is grammatical; the second is not.
  • It should be …how useful the things that she learnt at our company were.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
The first sentence is grammatical; the second is not.
It should be

…how useful the things that she learnt at our company were.
0
You can consider this, as well
She talked about the nature of her job and how useful the things that she learnt at our company was.
0
She talked about what her job was like and how useful what she learnt at our company was.
Grammatically, this is OK, but to me it sounds rather awkwardly worded. The two main clauses have completely differend structures.
"what she learnt at our company" is a noun clause.
What she learnt at our company was useful.

She talked about what her job was like and how
0
vsuresh…how useful the things that she learnt at our company was.
That’s not correct (compare The things that she learnt at our company were/*was useful).
AlpheccaStarsthis is OK, but to me it sounds rather awkwardly worded. … She talked about what her job was like and how useful the things that she learnt at our

Related Questions