0
Hans51 Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks.'

The second engineer, who's currently at a hospital, insists that he was misinformed by the train controller who was on duty at the time of the accident regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks.

'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks.'

Is the sentence correct?

I think that it should be 'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks at'.

Because it comes from 'what station was the train supposed to shift tracks at?'

Or is where between what station and the train omitted like 'regarding what station where the train was supposed to shift tracks.'?

What do you native English speakers think?

Thank you so much as usual in advance.
  

Top answer

Hans51 Is the sentence correct? No. Hans51 I think that it should be 'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks at'.

  • Hans51 Is the sentence correct?
  • No.
  • Hans51 I think that it should be 'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks at'.
  • This would fix the most pressing problem (though it would not exactly result in a beautifully elegant sentence).
  • '?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
Hans51Is the sentence correct?
No.
Hans51I think that it should be 'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks at'.
This would fix the most pressing problem (though it would not exactly result in a beautifully elegant sentence).
Hans51'regarding what station where the train was supp
0
Hans51I think that it should be 'regarding what station the train was supposed to shift tracks at'.
Yes, that's a little better.
Hans51Or is where between what station and the train omitted like 'regarding what station where the train was supposed to shift tracks.'?
No, not "what station where", but you could write "regardin

Related Questions