"mail receiver" does not seem terribly natural. It doesn't affect your question, but I'll assume "recipient" instead. You can use "a" or "the" before "recipient", though I prefer "the".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Mr Wordy "mail receiver" does not seem terribly natural. It doesn't affect your question, but I'll assume "recipient" instead.Thanks for pointing it out. I agree with you. I'll change it to recipient.
Mr WordyYou can use "a" or "the" before "recipient", though I prefer "the". There is effectively little difference in meaning. "a" mean
Clive Hi,
I think you may not realize this.
The noun 'mail' is uncountable.
You can speak of
some mail
the mail
but not
a mail.
You have to say eg
a piece of mail
three pieces of mail
a letter
three letters.
RazerThere are some nouns which don't ake any articles. How can we identify those nouns which don't take any articles? Is there any trick, specific way to identify them?Do you mean never take articles, or do not take an article in a specific context? I can't think of any nouns that can never take an article. Even proper nouns are amenable to constructi
CliveThe noun 'mail' is uncountable.Not when it means "email", which I believe is the OP's intention.
Mr Wordy Do you mean never take articles, or do not take an article in a specific context? I can't think of any nouns that can never take an article. Even proper nouns are amenable to constructions like "This is not the England that I know" or "We aimed to build a new England". Aside from proper nouns, the most obvious categories of noun that may not need articles are plu
RazerI meant both, never take articles and specific context. Please have a look at some starting lines of this website and then jump to the part where they have mentioned that no articles are needed before certain things like sports, languages, nations etc. http://www.learnenglish