0
Joe2012 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar
Regarding the use of article and meaning
Sentence: Unfortunately, corruption is a no issue for the public.
My question: Does the above sentence mean corruption is not an issue for the public anymore? Is the article "a" needed before the word no? Or can the sentence be said without the use of article, without changing its meaning?
Thanks and Regards
My question: Does the above sentence mean corruption is not an issue for the public anymore? Is the article "a" needed before the word no? Or can the sentence be said without the use of article, without changing its meaning?
Thanks and Regards
Top answer
Hi, Sentence: Unfortunately, corruption is a no issue for the public. My question: Does the above sentence mean corruption is not an issue for the public anymore? That seems to be the meaning, although the sentence is not correct, as noted below.
- Hi, Sentence: Unfortunately, corruption is a no issue for the public.
- My question: Does the above sentence mean corruption is not an issue for the public anymore?
- That seems to be the meaning, although the sentence is not correct, as noted below.
- Is the article "a" needed before the word no?
- No, it's not correct.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Hi,
Sentence: Unfortunately, corruption is a no issue for the public.
My question: Does the above sentence mean corruption is not an issue for the public anymore? That seems to be the meaning, although the sentence is not correct, as noted below.
Is the
Sentence: Unfortunately, corruption is a no issue for the public.
My question: Does the above sentence mean corruption is not an issue for the public anymore? That seems to be the meaning, although the sentence is not correct, as noted below.
Is the
0
Related Questions