0
Joe2012 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Regarding the diffrence between these two setences

Sentence: "It has not been made public" and "It has not made public".

My question: What is the diffrence between these two setences meaning wise ?
What diffrence the verb "been" is making ?

Uses of been always confuses me so also tell me 'extra' information, if you have any, regarding this sentence and the usage of verb 'been' in it, etc.

***To me the later sentence seems to be bit 'awkward' and 'incomplete' type if it's so from th native speaker's perspective also then do tell me about it.
  

Top answer

" (Passive Voice - the person/thing who is the recipient of the action (the person/thing that has something 'done to them') is the Subject of the sentence. "

  • " (Passive Voice - the person/thing who is the recipient of the action (the person/thing that has something 'done to them') is the Subject of the sentence.
  • "
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
I am, we are, it is

I was, we were, it was
I have been, We have been, it has been
I had been, We had been, it had been

It is part of the declension of the verb 'to be'
and is used when we use the Passive Voice:

"I gave him the book." (Active Voice - the person/thing performing the action is the Subject of the sentence.)

"The book was given
0
Thanks for your answer Terry. Emotion: smileWould be very glad if somebody answer my questions "more" specifically
0
To make something public = to let the public know

Usually this idiom is used in passive voice so the following verb structures are all correct (and they're all passives)

it is made public (by them, by the Government etc)

it was made public

it had been made public

it has been made public

Related Questions