Hi, Yes, it is. Clive
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Aspara Gus The subject is study, not we.I think this is one of those situations in which normal usage ignores abstract logic. The sentence seems natural enough to me.
fivejedjonI think this is one of those situations in which normal usage ignores abstract logic. The sentence seems natural enough to me.I see what you mean. But I am kind of strict, maybe too much so. Just because a usage, phrase, etc. sounds natural and is common doesn't make it right. Take reason why for example, rolls right off the tongue.
Aspara GusJust because a usage, phrase, etc. sounds natural and is common doesn't make it right.Just because an expression doesn't fit the rules of logic doesn;t make it wrong.
fivejedjon…aren't I is logically wrong, but absolutely correct and natural in standard English.It isn't so much illogical but ungrammatical and therefore not correct English. Just because it's standard doesn't mean it's correct. Are I does not conform to the rules of grammar; it's not a matter of logic.
Aspara GusI wouldn't do it. The subject is study, not we.You lost me. Please explain your objection.
enoonYou lost me. Please explain your objection.Reflexive pronouns should be used to reflect or intensify a name or a pronoun already present or implied in the sentence. In the original poster's example, ourselves replaces a personal pronoun, rather than reflects an overt or implied one, as in the sentences Arm yourself and You should arm your
Aspara GusReflexive pronouns should be used to reflect or intensify a name or a pronoun already present or implied in the sentence. II posit that the pronoun "we" is implied in the sentence. After all, who else is studying the universe? The reflexive is far better stylistically than using the alternative -- "us."