Are the highlighted "its" and "it" referring to "the state of current discourse on US border policy"?
Context:
As the critic Chris Kraus has noted, the BFP (The Border Film Project) reinforces the separateness of these groups, and even their installation does not point to the groups’ interdependence. The prosperity of the US Minutemen appears not to be connected to one of its principle sources, the migrants who answer the US markets’ demand for labor. The BFP presents conceptual-art-style documentation with little or no interpretation or argument; this strategy seems to work against its effectiveness in arguing for border-policy reform. For all its strengths and good intentions the BFP echoes the state of current discourse on US border policy, since it too presents localized migration problems as a stalemate that pits one population against the other, rather than revealing it as a stage where, to use Hirschhorn’s words, global markets entwine and mutate.
For all its strengths and good intentions the BFP echoes the state of current discourse on US border policy, US since it too presents localized migration problems as a stalemate that pits one population against the other, rather than revealing it as a sta
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
For all its strengths and good intentions the BFP echoes the state of current discourse on US border policy, US since it too presents localized migration problems
red appleAre the highlighted "its" and "it" referring to "the state of current discourse on US border policy"?
No. They refer to the BFP (The Border Film Project).
CJ