0
Pymoonlight Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

reduced noun clause

hello:
I'm learning reduced noun clause. I wonder if the 'that' clause in the first sentence can be reduced to an infinitive phrase. According to the grammar rules I learned, if the main sentence and dependent clause both have the same subject, dependent clause could be reduced to a phrase. Are both sentences has the same meaning?

1.I was afraid that I might hurt him.
2. I was afraid to hurt him.
  

Top answer

The meaning of 1 and 2 is different: 1 means you were concerned that your actions could do him harm. 2 means you hesitated to do him harm. The problem in the above two sentences is that the clause, "that I might hurt him," does not function as a noun in the sentence.

  • The meaning of 1 and 2 is different: 1 means you were concerned that your actions could do him harm.
  • 2 means you hesitated to do him harm.
  • The problem in the above two sentences is that the clause, "that I might hurt him," does not function as a noun in the sentence.
  • It has an adverbial function.
  • In the following, you have a clause that functions as a noun, and this can be replaced with an infinitive phrase, with no change in meaning: I decided that I would go.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
The meaning of 1 and 2 is different:

1 means you were concerned that your actions could do him harm.

2 means you hesitated to do him harm.

The problem in the above two sentences is that the clause, "that I might hurt him," does not function as a noun in the sentence. It has an adverbial function. In the following, you have a clause that functions as a noun, and this ca

Related Questions