0
Avangi Posted 17 years ago
Vocabulary

Re: "as such"

Hi,

Just came across a web opinion about misuses of "as such." I understand that it must have an antecedent, but the following, which I've altered considerably, seems out of line:

One must first register to vote, which this girl has not done. As such, she is ineligible.

This is called incorrect for want of an antecedent. Although a correction has not been given, I expect the following would be acceptable:

This is a girl who has failed to register. As such, she is ineligible.

Would you say that "girl" is a proper antecedent in my second example, but not in my first?

(It just seems to me more of a symantic issue than a grammatical one.)

Thanks for any insight you may wish to contribute.

- A.Emotion: smile
  

Top answer

" I understand that it must have an antecedent, but the following, which I've altered considerably, seems out of line: One must first register to vote, which this girl has not done. As such, she is ineligible. This is called incorrect for want of an antecedent.

  • " I understand that it must have an antecedent, but the following, which I've altered considerably, seems out of line: One must first register to vote, which this girl has not done.
  • As such, she is ineligible.
  • This is called incorrect for want of an antecedent.
  • Although a correction has not been given, I expect the following would be acceptable: This is a girl who has failed to register.
  • As such, she is ineligible.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Hi,

Just came across a web opinion about misuses of "as such." I understand that it must have an antecedent, but the following, which I've altered considerably, seems out of line:

One must first register to vote, which this girl has not done. As such, she is ineligible.

This is called incorrect for want of an antecedent. Although a correction has not been give
0
Avangi:

I don't know that there are any rigid rules about definiteness of antecedents. I find both examples to be clear. The only logical antecedent for "she" (female) is "this girl". However, in the second sentence, I would write "This is the girl."
0
Thanks Clive and Alphecca. I thought I had an inkling as to what was being objected to, but I may have been wrong. I'll throw caution to the wind, and post the original:
A plaintiff must prove damages in order to recover, but Smith has not done so here. As such, she has no claim.

I think this is about the same with respect to the legitimacy of the antecedent.

Related Questions