Osee Is there a rule for using such a structure to express ideas? org/wiki/Public_relations#Spin .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
OseeIs there a rule for using such a structure to express ideas?This type of construction is known as or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_relations#Spin.
BokehOseeIs there a rule for using such a structure to express ideas?This type of construction is known as or .
Rarely in the gaming industry can one find a game that is equally fun and educationalWell, the way it is written is absolutely meaningless. For example, Rarely: What is the benchmark? Who says so? One: who is the text talking about? Fun/educational: According to who? Whose opinion is this?
Without inversion the red phrase would be:
Rarely in the gaming industry one can find a game that is equally fun and educational
Marius HancuI disagree. The sentence can stand without inversion, it just needs to be voc
Rarely in the gaming industry one can find a game that is equally fun and educational
I'd argue that rarely fronting the sentence requires inversion (thus "can one").
Marius HancuI am talking about the predominant usage here:You said "required", anyway not being "predominant" doesn't make a construction erroneous.