0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Random questions

Which is correct, or are both acceptable? Weather forecaster says "Chance for rain" or "Threat for showers." I have always said "Chance of rain" and "Threat of showers."

Why is it that I never see (or hear) "seek" or "sought" without the use of the word "after?" Is it not correct to merely say "I seek" (rather than "I seek after") or, for example "Jewels are a highly sought...." rather than "Jewels are a highly sought after...."

Finally, is not "tuna fish" redundant? What other kind of tuna is there but the fish? Why not merely and simply "tuna?"

These have been bothering me for a long time and I can not find definitive answers!
  

Top answer

Hi, Which is correct, or are both acceptable? Weather forecaster says "Chance for rain" Sounds OK, just a bit more casual. " I agree, doesn't sound quite right.

  • Hi, Which is correct, or are both acceptable?
  • Weather forecaster says "Chance for rain" Sounds OK, just a bit more casual.
  • " I agree, doesn't sound quite right.
  • But weather forecasters are not famous for good English.
  • " Me too.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
Hi,

Which is correct, or are both acceptable? Weather forecaster says

"Chance for rain" Sounds OK, just a bit more casual.

or "Threat for showers." I agree, doesn't sound quite right. But weather forecasters are not famous for good English.
0
Hi
AnonymousWhich is correct, or are both acceptable? Weather forecaster says "Chance for rain" or "Threat for showers." I have always said "Chance of rain" and "Threat of showers."
Threat of/threat for

The preposition "for" is very rarely used for the object that threatens, but the things or persons that would be damaged by the threat. e.g.

0
AnonymousFinally, is not "tuna fish" redundant? What other kind of tuna is there but the fish? Why not merely and simply "tuna?"
Americans say "tuna fish". Outside the US, it's just tuna. It's weird because the word fish in this context, is unnecessary and therefore wordy. It goes without saying that tuna is a kind of fish. There is no other kind of animal wit
0
AnonymousThere is no other kind of animal with that name.
But there is another edible tuna - the fruit of certain cacti.
0
AlpheccaStars AnonymousThere is no other kind of animal with that name.But there is another edible tuna - the fruit of certain cacti.
That's odd. Is that why Americans add the word "fish" after tuna? What is that fruit called, outside the USA?
0
If you order a tuna sandwich in the USA, you really don't need to worry much that you are going to get a cactus-fruit sandwich!

Related Questions