0Yes for all, IMO, but only in a first approximation. 02br 00To many, esp in such contexts, 01i 00should02i 00 brings in an 01b 00element of chance02b 00, thus more accurate readings would IMO be:02br 01i 00I'01b 00m02b 00 surprised that you 01b 00should be02b 00 so foolish. 02i 02br 01i 00I 01b 00was02b 00 surprised that you 01b 00should have been02b 00 so foolish.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
01cite10CalifJim12cite10 Palmer (11i10The English Verb12i10) calls this 'evaluative' should. It has the same meaning as when the non-modal form is used, according to Palmer.12br10Ge
11i10I'm surprised that you [should be / are] so foolish.12i12br
12blockquote