What conclusions can we draw from the following two sentences written in bold?
1. The next train to arrive was from York.
A) The next train that was going to arrive was from York B) The next train that had arrived/arrived was from York C) The next train that would have arrived was from York D) The next train that would arrive was from York
2. The next train to have arrived was from York.
A) The next train that was going to arrive was from York B) The next train that had arrived/arrived was from York C) The next train that would have arrived was from York D) The next train that would arrive was from York
Top answer
1. The next train to arrive was from York. = The next train that arrived was from York.
— Cool Breeze
1.
The next train to arrive was from York.
= The next train that arrived was from York.
I would avoid a perfect infinitive (to have arrived) in that sentence.
CB
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1. The next train to arrive was from York. = The next train that arrived was from York. I would avoid a perfect infinitive (to have arrived) in that sentence. CB
Thank you for your comment.However, I don't see a good reason why we should avoid perfect infinitive. I also think that, whether "perfect infinitive" or "to infinitive", one may well sense a future reference in both cases.
1. can be either A or B. The infinitive, of course, has no tense marker, so the next train to arrive is either the next train that was expected to arrive or the next train that did arrive.
2. is C, to my ear. the next train to have arrived is the next train that was to have arrived or that was supposed to have arrived or that was expected to have arrived. This case has a strong c