"How come not "missed" but "missing" in the following sentences?

0The following sentences are from "Longman dictionary of comtemporary English."02br
02br
00My question is,02br
02br
001. How come not "missed" but "missing" in the following sentences?02br
02br
002. Isn't there any one sentence that 'missed' is possible? (I mean both 'missing' and 'missed' are possible)02br
02br
00Expecting your help.02br
02br
00Thanks. 05002br
02br
001 something 00that is missing00 is not in its usual place, so that you cannot find it:02br
02br
02br
05102br
02br
00◆• We found 00the missing piece00 of the jigsaw under the chair.02br
02br
00 00 00the missed piece (?)02br
02br
00◆• The keys have been missing for ages.02br
02br
00• Two bottles 00were missing00 from the drugs cupboard.02br
02br
00• The scissors have 00go00ne 00missing00 again. 00(British English)00 02br
02br
02br
002 if 00part of something is missing00, it is no longer attached or has been destroyed:02br
02br
00• Two of her front teeth were missing.02br
02br
00• The last page of the diary was missing.02br
02br
00• There's a button missing from your shirt.02br
02br
02br
003 someone who is missing has disappeared, and no one knows if they are alive or dead:02br
02br
00• Two crew members survived, but two are still missing.02br
02br
00• Nearly 100,000 young people go missing in Britain each year.00(British English)00 02br
02br
00• When Lily did not come home, her parents called the police to report her missing.02br
02br
02br
00400 00not present or not included in something02br
02br
00• Why is my name missing from the list?02br
02br
00• Something was missing from her life.02br
02br
00◆ 5 00missing in action00 00: 00a soldier who is missing in action has not returned after a battle and their body has not been found02br
0510name[문서의 처음]511name[문서의 처음]