0
K48 Posted 19 years ago
Vocabulary

"go in for" - to use or not to use, that is the question

0 Hi, 02br
02br
00I'm a Russian learner of English and I'm very much concerned about this expression, "to go in for (e.g. sports)" that we are taught at school and university. Some people are inserting it nearly in every sentence. It didn't sound OK for me so I tried to do a little research. 02br
02br
00The dictionaries, especially those made by Russians, suggest that "to go in for" is OK to use and describe its meaning just like we are taught - to take up something as a hobby, to engage in, to show interest for, etc.02br
02br
00However, in the Wikipedia entry about Runglish (05000) this expression is strictly denied as being particular only to Russians. But wiki is not the most credible source, so I searched the Internet for discussions of this expression, and they all gave entirely different opinions about that: some do not even understand this expression, and some say that this is OK but sounds very archaic. 02br
02br
00So, I just want to ask for your opinion on this:02br
02br
001) Are you a native English or American speaker, or smth else?02br
002) Do you understand this expression?02br
003) Do you personally use this expression, "to go in for smth"?02br
004) Do you use it only in "to go in for sports" or in other cases as well? A couple of examples maybe?02br
005) Do you find it sounding archaic? Since what time do you think it became archaic? In recent years or long ago?02br
006) Would you recommend to use it in everyday speech? In essays/compositions? Any other applications?02br
02br
00Thanks. I need as much opinions as possible 0510240hrefhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runglish11id1
  

Top answer

com+%22go+in+for%22+&btnG=Google+Search

  • com+%22go+in+for%22+&btnG=Google+Search
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
0 See this idiom site: 02br
05002br
02br
00 For examples at the New York Times, see this search output at Google:02br
02br
05102br
02br
00 which you can obtain yourself, if you search Google for 02br
01font00 site:nytimes.com "go in for" 02font02br
02br
025
0
0I still can't understand. The article at answers.com says "[Mid-1800s]" - does it mean that the expression is out of date, archaic? Then why it is still used, e.g. in NY Times? Does it have some stylistic peculiarity? Does it sound bookish, create some special style? 0-
0
0 It's a current expression, answers.com gives the approx01b00 first02b00 date. 02br
02br
00 Do you think the New York Times would use it otherwise in so many instances?02br
02br
00 It's not formal at all. Just read those examples and you'll get the flavor or it. 0-
0
0Hi K4802br
02br
001) native American English speaker02br
02br
002) I understand it, but I do not think it is a clear expression. In some cases I might not be sure I completely understand the intent of the speaker.02br
02br
003) I never use this expression.02br
02br
004) If I used it I would not use it for sports. Fo
0
If you do a search on the internet "go in for sport," you'll see that many of the hits come from Russian speakers of English. The idiom is used, but not often, by native speakers, despite it's prevalence in Russian textbooks. (I taught English in Russia/Belarus/Moldova for five years.
KM

<<web site removed>>
0
I have found this definition: 

To make the object of one's labors, studies, etc. [1913 Webster]

He was as ready to go in for statistics as for                 anything else.                   --Dickens.

Related Questions