I am encountering difficulty in distinguishing whether there should be a pair of quotation marks around for a case like this. I feel, a lot of times, people skip the word 'that' or do not care to put quotation marks if what is noted requires the punctuation marks.
He said you should give him the watch
What is this? A direct quote? Then why are there no quotation marks? Reported speech? Then why isn't there the word 'that' before 'you'?
Top answer
He said you should give him the watch . This is reported speech. 'That ' is optional here and usually is.
— Mister Micawber
He said you should give him the watch .
This is reported speech.
'That ' is optional here and usually is.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Thank you. So, the modal 'should' can function in the past-time settings as well as in the present-time settings? I think I heard from someone that a past form of 'should' is 'had to'. On a second thought, I think I have heard something to the effect that the past form of 'must' is 'had to'. Right?
So, are these good? What comes after the verb 'suggested', 'mentioned', 'recommended', et
> So, the modal 'should' can function in the past-time settings as well as in the present-time settings? Yes. Most of the modals do that. They're are quite time-independent.