Maple Sentence: The way relevance theory accounts for such “loose talk” is by claiming that the relationship between what we say and the thoughts we intend to communicate is one of interpretive resemblance – the thoughts we intend to communicate is one of interpretive resemblance – in other words, we do not necessarily say what we think, but more often than not what we say interpretively resembles what we intend to communicate. My trouble: I can't read it, especially the latter part of it containing "more often than not what". ) So could you please paraphrase it?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
MapleSentence:
The way relevance theory accounts for such “loose talk” is by claiming that the relationship between what we say and the thoughts we intend to communicate is one of interpretive resemblance – the thoughts we intend to communicate is one of interpretive resemblance – in other words, we do not necessarily say what we think, but