0
Awence Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Questions on Tenses

Below are a few questions i disgree with the teacher of my child, please give your guidance.

1. The mischievous boy (fought) with another boy in class in the last period.

(I think that "was fighting" could be an optional answer, but the teacher told my child that fought is the only acceptable answer)

2. Both the girls (stay/are staying) in that neighbourhood.

"are staying" is given as an alternative answer, but i beg to differ as i see no reason to emphasize the sentence. stay is also a stative verb)

3. The electrician told us that he (had repaired )the fan in ten minutes.

(i think would repair is a more suitable answer)

3.
  

Top answer

1. The mischievous boy (fought) with another boy in class in the last period. (I think that "was fighting" could be an optional answer, but the teacher told my child that fought is the only acceptable answer) I don't see anything grammatically wrong with the progressive.

  • 1.
  • The mischievous boy (fought) with another boy in class in the last period.
  • (I think that "was fighting" could be an optional answer, but the teacher told my child that fought is the only acceptable answer) I don't see anything grammatically wrong with the progressive.
  • g.
  • one which stopped the action): The boys were fighting when the teacher intervened.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
1. The mischievous boy (fought) with another boy in class in the last period.
(I think that "was fighting" could be an optional answer, but the teacher told my child that fought is the only acceptable answer)

I don't see anything grammatically wrong with the progressive.
But the progressive is most often
0
Hi,
Not knowing exactly what instructions were given to the students, it's hard to be fair. But I can give you my opinion based on what you've said.

1. The mischievous boy (fought) with another boy in class in the last period.

(I think that "was fighting" could be an opt
0
Awenceplease give your guidance
In all three cases, both the teacher's responses and your suggested alternatives are possible. The only thing that might change my opinion about this is seeing the original instructions given for the exercise. As Avangi says, without that we can't be sure.

CJ
0
For question no3, i beg to differ as it is very common for people to mean after 10 minutes when we say, i will meet you in 10 minutes. i think "in 10 minutes" can also mean after ten minutes (and within 10 minutes). So I do not see why "would repair" is forbidden in this context. It was like a narration in the past that informed about the following action of the electrician.

What do you
0
I'm not sure who said that "would repair" is forbidden in this context. I hope it wasn't I.

I think I understand your point about "in."

I'll have it repaired in ten minutes.
(I'll have somebody begin repairing it in ten minutes.)
I'll have the power back on in ten minutes.
(I'll do whatever's necessary to assure that
0
AwenceSo I do not see why "would repair" is forbidden in this context.
I don't think that anyone said it was "fobidden."
My comment was that "would repair" is ambiguous, as compared to "had repaired."
In the course of a conversation, if it were used, the meaning probably would be understood from context.

Related Questions