0
Franco Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

Questioning some punctuation from a novel?

0 Hi guys, I'm working on my punctuation and am reading a lot of books. I come across loads of examples where the punctuation does not make sense according to a punctuation book I have been reading. I wonder if I could just ask some questions about the paragraph below, which is from a Thomas Hardy book I'm reading, "A pair of blue eyes"?02br
02br
01i00"Nobody would have expected the sun to shine on such an evening as this. Yet it appeared, low down upon the sea. Not with its natural golden fringe, sweeping the furthest ends of the landscape, not with the strange glare of whiteness which it sometimes puts on as an alternative colour, but as a splotch of vermillion red on a leaden ground - a red face looking on with a drunk leer."02i02br
02br
00 First of all wouldn't the second sentence be better with just a comma seperating it? As in "...such an evening as this, yet it appeared..." I see a lot of sentences like this where a comma could be used because the following sentence starts with the words "and, or, but, yet, or while" but the author instead uses a period (full stop) and then starts a new sentence with a word like "But".02br
02br
00 Also, is it good punctuation where Hardy connects the above two sentences with a comma? "Not with its natural golden fringe, sweeping the furthest end of the landscape, not with the strange glare..."02br
02br
00 Shouldn't that last comma instead be a semicolon?02br
02br
00 I'd be interested to know if I am trying to look at the "rules" too much? Maybe punctuation has changed since the 19th century a bit, but I am still trying to get a feel for what is correct, and where there is room for indiviual style.0-
  

Top answer

02br 02br 01font 01i 00"Nobody would have expected the sun to shine on such an evening as this. Yet it appeared, low down upon the sea. "02i 02br 02br 00First of all wouldn't the second sentence be better with just a comma seperating it?

  • 02br 02br 01font 01i 00"Nobody would have expected the sun to shine on such an evening as this.
  • Yet it appeared, low down upon the sea.
  • "02i 02br 02br 00First of all wouldn't the second sentence be better with just a comma seperating it?
  • 00 The period before 'yet' makes a more definite or longer pause between the two thoughts.
  • The reader gets a chance to absorb the first thought, before being 'surprised by the contrast' of the second thought.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
0Hi Franco,02br
02br
00Welcome to the Forum.02br
02br
01font01i00"Nobody would have expected the sun to shine on such an evening as this. Yet it appeared, low down upon the sea. Not with its natural golden fringe, sweeping the furthest ends of the landscape, not with the strange glare of whiteness which it sometimes puts on
0
0 Hi Clive, and thanks for the reply. I agree about sentences becoming shorter. It seems like there used to be longer sentences with more commas and semicolons, and that's part of what I like about those novels. It is a more complex form of writing and I'm not sure some of the modern authors could construct such long sentences, and make them sound so good at the same time.02br
02
0
0Hello Franco02br
02br
00You might add the cadential comma to your list – a comma whose function is to indicate the rhythm. 02br
02br
00People tend to punctuate for sense, now; but in Hardy's day, it was still common for one person to read out loud, and others to listen. Punctuation told the reader when to breathe, and what the intonation should be.02br
0
It seems to be O.K. as it is.
0
Simple answer - don't necessarily put the blame on the author.

Hardy's manuscripts are much less heavily punctuated than the published versions.
Different publishers work to different style guides - two versions of "the same" novel may have major differences in the detail.

Mpemba

Related Questions