0
Blackballed Posted 10 years ago
Grammar
Question about Second Conditional!
Hello!! This is a remarkable site to learn and polish our grammar skills!
I have a question:
1.- Is it correct If I say: Was/were she to see a ghost, she would scream.
I know that the common way to write that semtence would be: If she saw a ghost, she would scream. I just want to know if that option is fine.
I have a question:
1.- Is it correct If I say: Was/were she to see a ghost, she would scream.
I know that the common way to write that semtence would be: If she saw a ghost, she would scream. I just want to know if that option is fine.
Top answer
"Were she to see a ghost, she would scream" is correct English. It feels rather formal or literary. "Was she to see a ghost, she would scream" is not right.
- "Were she to see a ghost, she would scream" is correct English.
- It feels rather formal or literary.
- "Was she to see a ghost, she would scream" is not right.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
"Were she to see a ghost, she would scream" is correct English. It feels rather formal or literary.
"Was she to see a ghost, she would scream" is not right.
"Was she to see a ghost, she would scream" is not right.
0
Related Questions