0
Ruchi Chuhan Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Question

might be they used wasted flesh for campaign

Is this right grammatically?
  

Top answer

Ruchi Chuhan might be they used wasted flesh for campaignIs this right grammatically? No. There is no subject.

— AlpheccaStars

  • Ruchi Chuhan might be they used wasted flesh for campaignIs this right grammatically?
  • No.
  • There is no subject.
  • Besides, it does not mean anything to me.
  • This fixes the grammar, but still doesn't impart meaning.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Ruchi Chuhan might be they used wasted flesh for campaignIs this right grammatically?
No. There is no subject. Besides, it does not mean anything to me.

This fixes the grammar, but still doesn't impart meaning.

Maybe they used wasted flesh for the/ their campaign.
0
0
yeah for their campaign is right
but I am confused about whether tio use may be or might be
The sentence means, they used wated flesh for their advertisement.
0
0
Can you tell me whether I should use may be or might be
0
0
Maybe = perhaps (adverb)
Might be = a verb phrase. It needs a subject.

Why would anyone use dried-up or rotten meat for their advertisement? It is offensive and appalling.
0

Related Questions