", assuming that 'who's' is the contraction for 'who is', correct there? Yes. "?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
LaboriousIs "who's they?", assuming that 'who's' is the contraction for 'who is', correct there?Yes.
LaboriousShouldn't "Who's they?" be "Who're (who are) they?"?No. It is all in how you interpret this conversation.
AlpheccaStarsB: They. They're here. A: They? Who's they? = (Who do you mean when you say the word "they"?)So, in contexts like that, the speaker may use either form, whether it be 'who's they?' or 'who're they?'. If they consider 'they' as a noun or just a word, then it's OK to say 'Who'sthey?'. Have I
LaboriousSo, in contexts like that, the speaker may use either form, whether it be 'who's they?' or 'who're they?'The meaning is entirely different.
AlpheccaStarsD ickI guess the profanity filter is being one now...
Laboriouscan we use this singular auxiliary verb (Edit: sorry, It's a main verb in these situations)Off topic: You were not wrong to call is an auxiliary verb. See English grammar.