Could somebody please help me. I don't have the faintest idea about the true meaning of the mentioned idiom. Well, okay - I guess it is either sexual or drug related, but that's all. I would be very happy, if someone could enlighten the issue a bit. Here is an excerpt of the text in question (some of you know the book, I'm sure): "Hippies, the headmaster thought, seeing a pair of fans making 'the book with two covers' in the grass. Drug addicts. D&D players. He'd turn them all to cinders if he could,..." Thanks in advance! J.P.
Top answer
[nq:1]Could somebody please help me. I don't have the faintest idea about the true meaning of the mentioned idiom. Well, ...
— Usenet
[nq:1]Could somebody please help me.
I don't have the faintest idea about the true meaning of the mentioned idiom.
Well, ...
book with two covers' in the grass.
Drug addicts.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]Could somebody please help me. I don't have the faintest idea about the true meaning of the mentioned idiom. Well, ... book with two covers' in the grass. Drug addicts. D&D players. He'd turn them all to cinders if he could,..."[/nq] It's not an idiom in the strict sense of the word - I've never heard it before. However, from the little context it probably means something like "havin
[nq:2]Could somebody please help me. I don't have the faintest ... players. He'd turn them all to cinders if he could,..."[/nq] [nq:1]It's not an idiom in the strict sense of the word - I've never heard it before. However, from the little context it probably means something like "having ***".[/nq] Perhaps a headmaster-ish version of "making the beast with two backs" (Othello)?
"Phil C." (Email Removed) kirjoitti viestissä [nq:2]It's not an idiom in the strict sense of the ... the little context it probably means something like "having ***".[/nq] [nq:1]Perhaps a headmaster-ish version of "making the beast with two backs" (Othello)? Phil C.[/nq] Yes... I gave it a thought, and I must say that I wouldn't be a bit suprised, if you were right. Thanks, I shal
[nq:1]true sexual or I'm book them all[/nq] [nq:2]Perhaps a headmaster-ish version of "making the beast with two backs" (Othello)? Phil C.[/nq] [nq:1]Yes... I gave it a thought, and I must say that I wouldn't be a bit suprised, if you were right. Thanks, I shall now count on your explanation![/nq] If he hadn't specified a pair, I'd have assumed it was a "lucky Alphonse" threesome.