0
Hugh Riddle Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Puzzled by simple-looking sentence

I found the sentence below confusing to analyse and wonder whether I have got it right.

'I sat writing down what John had told me.'

1. 'I sat' is the independent clause.
2. 'writing down what John had told me' is a participial adverbial phrase, modifying the verb 'sat'.
3. 'what John had told me' is a clause with: subject John, verb had told, object what, indirect object me.

I can't find much dicussion of 'what' except that it can imply 'that which'; in that case, what part of speech is it? I'd be very glad for any comment or correction.
  

Top answer

Hi, I looked it up for you. ' What John had told me' is identified by Quirk & Greenbaum as a nominal relative clause . ' What' is classified as a pronoun, or more specifically, a nominalized relative pronoun.

  • Hi, I looked it up for you.
  • ' What John had told me' is identified by Quirk & Greenbaum as a nominal relative clause .
  • ' What' is classified as a pronoun, or more specifically, a nominalized relative pronoun.
  • It is called that way because essentially it is a combination of 'that+which'.
  • 'That' refers to a nominal reference of some kind.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Hi,

I looked it up for you. 'What John had told me' is identified by Quirk & Greenbaum as a nominal relative clause. 'What' is classified as a pronoun, or more specifically, a nominalized relative pronoun. It is called that way because essentially it is a combination of 'that+which'. 'That' refers to a nominal reference of some kind. Such sentences can always
0
Thanks dokterjokkebrok, that really helped me understand that one.
0
Others would say that it is a fused relative.

Huddleston & Pullum, (2002.1068-79) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: CUP
0
And according to CGEL, fused relatives are phrases, not clauses.

Related Questions