Puntuation

if I could start senior member carter by saying that the administrative appeals tribunal remarks at point 23 that dr frederick saw mr smith at the employers request reading on at point 24 the tribunal turns to the second report again obtained at the request of one of the companies in its list simpson manufacturing from a specialist dr lowman it was she senior member who was specifically asked to assess the applicant she predicted as outlined at paragraph 25 and as quoted by the tribunal that the applicant would benefit from such treatment she opines he may continue to suffer chronic pain but theres a strong possibility the applicants psychiatric state would improve significantly if not resolve completely with appropriate treatment my learned friend further noted in his submissions that the precise diagnosis of a persons condition becomes a more refined matter as time goes on the tribunal after those paragraphs in which it dealt with the applicants psychiatric prognosis turned back to a particular practitioner who appeared before it senior member and gave some oral evidence thats a physical doctor dr brown who is a rheumatologist its then referred to by the tribunal in some quotes from dr browns reports furthermore the tribunal continued its discussion of the doctors evidence through to the end of paragraph 29 they then turned to the other witness called by simpson manufacturing the neurologist professor bates