0
Anonymous Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Proper nouns and uncountable nouns

Would one ever think of proper nouns in terms of being countable or mass/uncountable? Or do those only apply to common nouns?

And secondly, would one consider abstract nouns to be common nouns? When reading about common nouns I usually see concrete nouns mentioned as examples.

Thanks
  

Top answer

Anonymous Would one ever think of proper nouns in terms of being countable yes There have been sixteen Dukes of Cambridge. ) or mass/uncountable I don't think so. And secondly, would one consider abstract nouns to be common nouns?

  • Anonymous Would one ever think of proper nouns in terms of being countable yes There have been sixteen Dukes of Cambridge.
  • ) or mass/uncountable I don't think so.
  • And secondly, would one consider abstract nouns to be common nouns?
  • yes When reading about common nouns I usually see concrete nouns mentioned as examples.
  • That seems to be true, but the site below lists abstract nouns with other common nouns.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
AnonymousWould one ever think of proper nouns in terms of being countable yes
There have been sixteen Dukes of Cambridge. (I have no idea what the real number is.)

or mass/uncountable I don't think so.

And secondly, would one consider abstract nouns to be common nouns? yes

When reading about common noun
0
AnonymousWould one ever think of proper nouns in terms of being countable or mass/uncountable?
Yes. At least theoretically, it is possible to say: Do you think there will ever be two Swedens? (In my grammar and my dictionaries, duke isn't a proper noun.)

CB
0
Cool Breeze
AnonymousWould one ever think of proper nouns in terms of being countable or mass/uncountable?
Yes. At least theoretically, it is possible to say: Do you think there will ever be two Swedens? (In my grammar and my dictionaries, duke isn't a proper noun.)
But I think that in 'Duke of Cambridge' one could argue
0
canadian45duke isn't a proper noun.)
But I think that in 'Duke of Cambridge' one could argue that it is.
There are different ways of analyzing language. I wouldn't capitalize 'duke' in 'duke of Cambridge' as the name of the person isn't mentioned. In the same way:

Did the president of the United States attend the meeting?

Did P

Related Questions