0
Littlefuryman Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Pronoun case agreement

Hello,

The following example of improper usage of case is provided in Fowler's Modern English Usage Dictionary:

. . . the lady whom I had suspected to be she whom I had sought (or something to that effect).

I understand that copulative verbs cannot connect noun phrases whose heads are of discrepant cases, and so naturally know that this must be 'her', not 'she'.

This example is presented alongside a different example which apparently has the same error:

It is not likely that other and inferior works were done at the same time by an impostor pretending to be *he*.

I simply do not understand why this should not be 'he'. If we expanded it fully would it not be "an impostorwho was pretending to be he"?

A detailed explanation would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks
  

Top answer

Could someone please attempt an explanation?

  • Could someone please attempt an explanation?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Could someone please attempt an explanation?
0
Ok, I'll hazard an explanation

Here is your sentence:

It is not likely that other and inferior works were done at the same time by an impostor pretending to be *he*.

Definition of copula: Grammar . a verb, as be, seem, or look, that serves as a connecting link or establishes an identity between subject and complement.

The infinitive "be" is
0
Hmm, I'll have to think about that. Thanks for your take.

Related Questions