Most people accept it these days.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousAs I thought, it's always been grammatically correct.Not if you have a conservative editor or are taking some language proficiency tests, however. I suggest that you recast just to be on the safe side: He would never be nasty to people until they stepped over the line.
Anonymous They couldn't really present a case for it being ungrammatical.No! Go ahead and challenge them!
AnonymousThey couldn't really present a case for it being ungrammatical.They could. Anybody is singular; they is plural.
fivejedjon AnonymousThey couldn't really present a case for it being ungrammatical.They could. Anybody is singular; they is plural.Yes, but can you please look at this and tell me what you think?
Anonymous fivejedjon AnonymousThey couldn't really present a case for it being ungrammatical.They could. Anybody is singular; they is plural.Yes, but can you please look at this and tell me what you think?"[...] The sentence is fully grammatical.." - Geoff Pullum, linguist.I agree with Pullum, as it happens. I had merely responded to your 'They couldn't reall
fivejedjon It's grammatical in Pullum's system of grammar. It's not grammatical in the systems propounded by many traditionalists.As I understand it, it is not Pullum's system, but is the way Standard English works: