Are either of the two following sentences more grammatically correct than the other?
Non-point source pollution is caused by rainfall moving over and through the ground. Non-point source pollution is caused by rainfall that moves over and through the ground.
The second sentence sounds more correct to me, but I know that the way a sentence sounds is not the best way to judge its grammatical correctness. For all I know, both could be correct. If so, is one more preferred than the other?
Thanks in advance.
Top answer
They both look good to me.
— Blue Jay
They both look good to me.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.