0
Jasonkhlim Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Present tense after past tense

''Some leisure activities that were popular in the past (such as playing the piano) are less popular today because of developments in technology.''

Is there any mistake with the text above?
I am wondering, can we use present tense after past tense?

I understand that when we are talking about universal truth, we can use present tense after past tense.
Example : The teacher told us that honesty is the best policy.

But what about my text above? Is there any grammar mistake?
  

Top answer

jasonkhlim Is there any mistake with the text above? I see none. jasonkhlim I am wondering, can we use present tense after past tense?

  • jasonkhlim Is there any mistake with the text above?
  • I see none.
  • jasonkhlim I am wondering, can we use present tense after past tense?
  • Sure, if the sentence structure and meaning legislate for it: I ate sushi last night, I'm eating sushi now, I'll eat sushi tomorrow, and in fact I eat sushi every day.
  • Example : The teacher told us that honesty is the best policy.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
jasonkhlimIs there any mistake with the text above?
I see none.
jasonkhlimI am wondering, can we use present tense after past tense?
Sure, if the sentence structure and meaning legislate for it: I ate sushi last night, I'm eating sushi now, I'll eat sushi tomorrow, and in fact I eat sushi every day.
0
Your original sentence is correct. The intervening relative clause has nothing to do with the subject/verb (activities/are) relationship.

Related Questions