Could you tell me what are differences between the following sentences in terms of meaning or nuance? Thank you.
1. The new regulation is enacted for the public weal. 2. The new regulation has been enacted for the public weal. 3. The new regulation was enacted for the public weal.
Top answer
I see none. The first is an unusual choice.
— Mister Micawber
I see none.
The first is an unusual choice.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.