0
Wwwdotcom Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

Present Continuous or Infinitive?

Below, I have 3 examples which may or may not make sense depending on the context. I was curious what other people thought of these sentences. Which of the following are interchangeable and which are obviously different?

1) Do you drive to work?

A) No, I am taking the train now.
B) No, I take the train now.

2) Do you go out to restaurants for dinner after work?

A) No, I am cooking now.
B) No, I cook now.

3) I am sorry for calling so late, but I have something important to discuss. Are you busy now?

A) No, I am just reading a book.
B) No, I read (a book, books).
  

Top answer

Dear wwwdotcom, It is a most interesting question. It is my opinion that it is possible to conclude from the question in number 1 and in number 2 that it is a question about a habit. It is possible therefore to comprehend each answer as an answer about habit.

  • Dear wwwdotcom, It is a most interesting question.
  • It is my opinion that it is possible to conclude from the question in number 1 and in number 2 that it is a question about a habit.
  • It is possible therefore to comprehend each answer as an answer about habit.
  • It is further my opinion that it is not possible to conclude from the question in number 3 that it is a question about a habit.
  • It is not possible therefore to give the answer 3B.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

16 Answers
0


Dear wwwdotcom,

It is a most interesting question.

It is my opinion that it is possible to conclude from the question in number 1 and in number 2 that it is a question about a habit. It is possible therefore to comprehend each answer as an answer about habit.

It is further my opinion that it is not possible to conclude from the question in number 3 that it is
0
Alright, but which would you use 1a, 2a? or 1b,2b? or both? Please explain why you made your choice. I think all of them could be relative to some habitual act, but I was really trying to get feedback on the verb as it stands as an infinitive versus turned into present continuous (verb + -ing). If you notice, "a" has verb + ing, but "b" is just the verb.
0
WwwdotcomBelow, I have 3 examples which may or may not make sense depending on the context. I was curious what other people thought of these sentences. Which of the following are interchangeable and which are obviously different?

1) Do you drive to work?

A) No, I am taking the train now.
B) No, I take the train now.

2) Do you go out to res
0
milky,

Well, I originally had "still" which I removed (as in "Do you still drive to work?"). In that case, now was to denote a change from the past. However, that doesn't really address the crux of my question. So, I took "still" out. I don't really see a change with or without "now" in 1, and in 2 it doesn't sound right to not have "now" in sentence "a". For three, it's more of a
0
Just my thoughts... Clearly in 1) & 2) you are asking about habits. This is not the case in 3), so I would exclude B) in 3).

Now, 1) & 2). "Do you drive to work?" is a yes or no question > "yes, I do"/"no, I don't". Or maybe if your habits have changed "Well, I used to, but now I take the train" (a new habit)/ "I used to, but I'm taking the train now" (an activity that you're still eng
0
Ok,

but.....

So far, three people have responded. 2 have mentioned habits, the other asked a question about the use of "now" before commenting.

Can someone reply to the question directly? How does it relate to PRESENT CONTINUOUS versus PLAIN FORM?

Please avoid tangents. I am specifically asking about the tenses of the verbs.

1 has a AND b. WHICH IN
0
I would answer:

1. No, I take the train.

(Possible: No, I'm taking the train these days.)

2. No, I eat at home.

(Possible: No, I'm eating at home these days.)

3. No, that's ok, I was just reading a book.

Or: No, that's ok, I'm just making a sandwich.

(But not the simple present.)

MrP
0
Wwwdotcommilky,

Well, I originally had "still" which I removed (as in "Do you still drive to work?"). In that case, now was to denote a change from the past. However, that doesn't really address the crux of my question. So, I took "still" out. I don't really see a change with or without "now" in 1, and in 2 it doesn't sound right to not have "now" in sentenc
0
milky,

Ok, but what about a sentence like "I watch the sunrise before I go to work". Here we have 2 unlimited actions by your explanation, watch and go. Wouldn't the act of watching the sunrise have a limit? After it has risen, it cannot rise anymore. Also, what if it is cloudy? Your rule makes sense with verbs like go, where we have additional information. With isolated actions i
0


The progressive form is used when the speaker perceives/understands the action as limited in some way, i.e. as having a beginning and an end.

So every native speaker who uses a progressive form "perceives" or "understands" the action as limited in some way?

MrP

Related Questions