0
Ditch Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Prepositions and Duration

Hi all!

The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 in little more than a decade.

The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 for little more than a decade.

Clearly the second one is wrong, but why is for is not an acceptable substitute for in in this sentence when in refers to the period of time over which the event has taken place and for is used for duration in other sentences, such as I've been collecting them for about 10 years or I had a nap for a few minutes?

The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 over little more than a decade.

Why does it have to be in over or over the course of and not just over?

Thanks.
  

Top answer

Ditch The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 in little more than a decade. The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 for little more than a decade. Clearly the second one is wrong, but why is for is not an acceptable substitute for in in this sentence when in refers to the period of time over which the event has taken place and for is used for duration in other sentences, such as I've been collecting them for about 10 years or I had a nap for a few minutes ?

  • Ditch The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 in little more than a decade.
  • The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 for little more than a decade.
  • Clearly the second one is wrong, but why is for is not an acceptable substitute for in in this sentence when in refers to the period of time over which the event has taken place and for is used for duration in other sentences, such as I've been collecting them for about 10 years or I had a nap for a few minutes ?
  • " At any given point in those ten years, the population was growing, so my second example sentence is OK.
  • However, in your population example the thing being described took the whole ten years to happen, rather than happening continuously throughout the ten years, if you see what I mean.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
Ditch
The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 in little more than a decade.

The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 for little more than a decade.

Clearly the second one is wrong, but why is for is not an acceptable substitute for in in this sentence when
0
That sounds right.

Thanks very much. Emotion: smile
0
Ditchwhy is for is not an acceptable substitute for in
It is not acceptable because the sentence mentions the end point of the growth (10,000).

You can go from point A to point B in an hour, but you can't go from point A to point B for an hour. In other words, it takes you an hour to go from A to B; it's not that you spend
0
Mr WordyI worked my way from office boy to director in ten years.
"director" is the end point. My method works!

0
Thanks! That answered my questions perfectly. Emotion: smile

Related Questions