Ditch The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 in little more than a decade. The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 for little more than a decade. Clearly the second one is wrong, but why is for is not an acceptable substitute for in in this sentence when in refers to the period of time over which the event has taken place and for is used for duration in other sentences, such as I've been collecting them for about 10 years or I had a nap for a few minutes ?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Ditch
The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 in little more than a decade.
The population of the town has grown from a few hundred to 10,000 for little more than a decade.
Clearly the second one is wrong, but why is for is not an acceptable substitute for in in this sentence when
Ditchwhy is for is not an acceptable substitute for inIt is not acceptable because the sentence mentions the end point of the growth (10,000).
Mr WordyI worked my way from office boy to director in ten years."director" is the end point. My method works!