0
Anonymous Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

prepositions

Is "it" a preposition?
Example: It's lips push into the shape of a horn.
(And no this is not the sentence that I'm wanting to answer)
  

Top answer

Hi anon; No , it is always a pronoun. In your sentence, the possessive form modifies "lips". You have used it incorrectly, a common mistake.

  • Hi anon; No , it is always a pronoun.
  • In your sentence, the possessive form modifies "lips".
  • You have used it incorrectly, a common mistake.
  • it's = it + is its = possessive form of it
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
Hi anon;
No, it is always a pronoun. In your sentence, the possessive form modifies "lips". You have used it incorrectly, a common mistake.

it's = it + is
its = possessive form of it
0
No, "it" is a pronoun.

BillJ
0
AlpheccaStarsNo, it is always a pronoun.
I wouldn't call it a pronoun in, for example, it is raining, since the word clearly has no antecedent. In this case, expletive or dummy is a more appropriate term.
0
Aspara GusAlpheccaStarsNo, it is always a pronoun.I wouldn't call it a pronoun in, for example, it is raining, since the word clearly has no antecedent. In this case, expletive or dummy is a more appropriate term.
AS is right. Dummy pronoun is just a subclass of pronoun, which is a subclass of noun. Having an antecedent is not a requirement for belonging to th
0
BillJHaving an antecedent is not a requirement for belonging to the pronoun category.
I have trouble accepting this statement. That's exactly what makes a pronoun a pronoun. If a dummy is a subclass of pronouns, one could also label a determiner a subclass of adjectives, when in truth they are two different parts of speech.
0
Aspara GusBillJHaving an antecedent is not a requirement for belonging to the pronoun category.I have trouble accepting this statement. That's exactly what makes a pronoun a pronoun. If a dummy is a subclass of pronouns, one could also label a determiner a subclass of adjectives, when in truth they are two different parts of speec
0
BillJThe pronoun "it", for example, has several non-anaphoric uses such as denoting weather, condition, place etc: …
That's true; however…
BillJIt doesn't represent a semantic argument and cannot be replaced by another NP; it has the purely syntactic function of filling the obliga
0
Aspara Gus…this is where I take issue with the term pronoun, which is at variance with the non-anaphoric nature of the words in question. For this reason, I would call them a subclass of noun before I would pronoun, which is, of course, a type of pro-form, mind you.
Not all pronouns are pro-forms:

A: "Was she arrested? B: I'm afraid so. (Not a p
0
BillJNot all pronouns are pro-forms.
We're getting nowhere fast! I have nothing more to say.

Related Questions