0
Top answer
Actually, both are correct. The feeling of each is slightly different, though. "Angry at" can sound more informal, in my opinion, but it also sounds more natural in a casual conversation.
- Actually, both are correct.
- The feeling of each is slightly different, though.
- "Angry at" can sound more informal, in my opinion, but it also sounds more natural in a casual conversation.
- "Angry at" also sounds like "mad at," which has the same meaning but is even more informal ("He's mad at me" and "he's angry at me" mean the exact same thing).
- "Angry with" is a more formal way to describe the situation, and is more usually used in a detached way.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Actually, both are correct. The feeling of each is slightly different, though.
"Angry at" can sound more informal, in my opinion, but it also sounds more natural in a casual conversation. "Angry at" also sounds like "mad at," which has the same meaning but is even more informal ("He's mad at me" and "he's angry at me" mean the exact same thing).
"Angry with" is a more formal way
"Angry at" can sound more informal, in my opinion, but it also sounds more natural in a casual conversation. "Angry at" also sounds like "mad at," which has the same meaning but is even more informal ("He's mad at me" and "he's angry at me" mean the exact same thing).
"Angry with" is a more formal way
0
Related Questions