Anonymous made from the cotton given him at the ceremonies "Given him" is fine. The "to" is optional. To me, the omission is natural when the indirect object directly follows the verb, and the direct object precedes the verb.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Anonymousmade from the cotton given him at the ceremonies"Given him" is fine. The "to" is optional.
Anonymous"given him" or "given to him"Both are OK. Naipaul was educated in England so his phrasing does not surprise me. "given him" strikes me as more typically British; "given to him" as American.
Anonymouscould some please elucidate when 'to' should be writtenOf course it would be obligatory in active voice, when the indirect object follows the direct object: