0
Seagull Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Preparatory object

#1 Tom found it hard to come up to Bob in mathematics.

#2 Tom found it hard that he comes up to Bob in mathematics.

#3 Tom found it hard that he came up to Bob in mathematics.

Can we rewrite #1 for #2 or #3? I don't think it's possible because they sound odd to me. However, I can't explain how and why they are wrong. What are your thoughts? Besides, is it possible to make a sentence that means the same as #1 by using the "(Tom) found it hard that ..." construction?
  

Top answer

The problem with 2 aqnd 3 is that you had a "that clause" construction, which made it sound awkward. # 1 is somewhat understood but not idiomatically smooth, nor it waas clear. I would word it this way: Tom found it hard to come up to Bob with mathematic questions.

  • The problem with 2 aqnd 3 is that you had a "that clause" construction, which made it sound awkward.
  • # 1 is somewhat understood but not idiomatically smooth, nor it waas clear.
  • I would word it this way: Tom found it hard to come up to Bob with mathematic questions.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
The problem with 2 aqnd 3 is that you had a "that clause" construction, which made it sound awkward. # 1 is somewhat understood but not idiomatically smooth, nor it waas clear. I would word it this way: Tom found it hard to come up to Bob with mathematic questions.
0
seagullCan we rewrite #1 for #2 or #3?
No. Simply because the structure is 'hard to do'.
seagulls it possible to make a sentence that means the same as #1 by using the "(Tom) found it hard that ..." construction?
I don't think so. The best I can do: Tom found it hard coming up to Bob in mathematics.
0
grammarfreakwith mathematics questions.
I don't think that is what is meant: they are not writing questions.
0
Thank you very much indeed, Mister Micawber.

The difference between #1 and #2&3 comes from the fact that 'to come to Bob' is a 'target' while 'that he comes/came up to Bob' is a 'fact.' Can we understand that way?
0
seagullThe difference between #1 and #2&3 comes from the fact that 'to come to Bob' is a 'target' while 'that he comes/came up to Bob' is a 'fact.' Can we understand that way?
Actually, I had thought about that for a moment, but I don't think that is the problem: the problem is in the particular semantics. If he succeeds in 'coming up' (as he does in #2 and #3
0
Thank you so much again, Mister Micawber.

I think that 'target' might not have been a right word.

Isn't it possible to consider that 'to infinitives' represent 'the idea that if someone is to do something?

'to come up to Bob' = the idea of 'if Tom is to come up to Bob'
'to fail his exam' = the idea of 'if he is to fail his exam'

I am pretty sure that explai
0
seagullIsn't it possible to consider that 'to infinitives' represent 'the idea that if someone is to do something?
Yes, infinitives in general represent the potential, the not-yet-realized, and that is handy to remember, though it reveals itself in many different forms and sometimes is only a marginal aspect of what is being said.
0
Many thanks, Mister Micawber.
I have learned a lot.
0
Thank your very much for your answer, grammarfreak.

Related Questions