0
Anonymous Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Post-Final exam mayhem...

Hello, my name is Jeffrey and I'm a teacher in South Korea. Well, finals are over and we get the usual arguments about certain questions but this case is a bit special. A parent came to our school and had "evidence" for her son's argument. Here are the two sentences...

1.) I posted my recipe for my own website. < ----- I feel this sentence is awkward

2.) I posted my recipe on my own website. <------ the more natural sentence

Problem is that I can't explain why no.2 is natural to me. Is sentence grammatically incorrect or is it right?

How would you grade sentence no.1? He is the ONLY student that got it wrong and his mother refuse to let it go.
  

Top answer

It is not a matter of grammar; it is a matter of semantics, of meaning. 'For' does not have the meaning of 'on' (as in a location): it is as simple as that. So it is not just unnatural; it is wrong.

  • It is not a matter of grammar; it is a matter of semantics, of meaning.
  • 'For' does not have the meaning of 'on' (as in a location): it is as simple as that.
  • So it is not just unnatural; it is wrong.
  • ) I posted my recipe for my own website.
  • -- I posted it on behalf of or for the purpose of my website (it was not posted on my website).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
It is not a matter of grammar; it is a matter of semantics, of meaning. 'For' does not have the meaning of 'on' (as in a location): it is as simple as that. So it is not just unnatural; it is wrong.

1.) I posted my recipe for my own website. -- I posted it on behalf of or for the purpose of my website (it was not posted on my website). As for context, the se
0
The better answer is clearly "on". We post things on other things. It's an analogy with posting a notice on a board. In the literal case you actualyl affix one thing on (in contact with the surface of) the other.

"for" is awkward because "for" is so often used to indicate who benefits from something.

I did that for my grandmother.

Or
0
Thank you all for the responses... unfortunately none of her "evidence" is correct. It's just that I can't explain it to her. HA! Imagine me explaining it to her in Konglish (Korean and English mixed). I know where she got these sentences from .. what she did was ..google them.. found it on someone's blog and bam.. its correct because its on a website/blog/article. And this is how every argumen
0
Thank you for the responses... finally found my username. The evidence that the parent had wasn't even evidence itself, its just that she google some sentences and found some examples and said... "AH HA, its on the internet therefore it must be right". My problem has always been trying to explain it in English/Korean about certain words.

Here are some of her evidence

I p
0
As I said, it depends on meaning, not grammar, and the meanings are of both the verb and the preposition - that is what you must drum into their thick heads. I'm sure it must be the same for Korean.

I posted some pictures for my website.- - Wrong if it means 'on my website'

I updated my software for my website. -- The software 'belongs to' the website
0
Again, thank you for a great response. Now the hard part is to drill it into their heads. The problem with English in Korea is that they apply their language to the English language. Korean language is the most scientific language in the world. Very easy to learn, 23 alphabets and the rules are easier to apply. Unfortunately, English is a difficult language to learn because there are so many

Related Questions