Antonija I was wondering whether you can have 'a positive effect on the satisfaction of somebody': To me, this seems OK, but I have a few other quibbles. Since cooperation is two-way and more or less symmetrical, I don't really understand the distinction between the "source of cooperation" and "the party to whom the cooperation had been directed". Is the "source" the person who instigated the cooperation perhaps?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AntonijaI was wondering whether you can have 'a positive effect on the satisfaction of somebody':To me, this seems OK, but I have a few other quibbles.
AntonijaYes, I think the source is the person who initiated the cooperatiton.In that case, I think it would be clearer to use the word "instigator".
Antonija so I guess both sides should get profit and satisfaction, but the author of the original text made this distinction, so I guess I will have to make it too