"point to" and "point at" are very similar. In this example they are used interchangeably. In certain contexts "point at" can possibly feel slightly more forceful or hostile.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
diotimaI found "obstacle course" but I have never heard of it.'obstacle course' is a well-known expression, but you would use that only if the kids are to treat the objects as barriers that they must avoid (run around or jump over) while running through the pathway. I don't think that's what you want.
diotimaMany thanks GPY. So, should I give instruction to a child in a class, for example, point to your toes/nose, would it be more appropriate than point at?You can use either.
diotimaOne last question: I am setting a sort of pathway with stations (cones, small hula hoop on the ground) for indoors physical activity with ch
diotimaobstacle course
I've checked out some websites on children's activities, and I found that indeed the kind of thing you describe is often called an obstacle course.
See, for example, the description of 'obstacle course' (Number 11) at this link:
CJ
GPYdiotimaMany thanks GPY. So, should I give instruction to a child in a class, for example, point to your toes/nose, would it be more appropriate than point at?Late arriving at this thread, I just wanted to make a social comment on how "point" has become acceptable, where back in history "it is rude to point" was taught. One may "indicate". As W.S.Gilbert