Anonymous The lack of time and enthusiasm are the two main obstacles.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousThe lack of time and enthusiasm are the two main obstacles.
AnonymousIs this sentence correct?Technically, no, because the subject is singular.
Aspara GusAnonymousIs this sentence correct?Technically, no, because the subject is singular. I understand where you are coming from, but I disagree with your conclusion. One doesn't need to repeat "lack". As is, it's quite clear that two things are lacking.
canadian45but I disagree with your conclusion. One doesn't need to repeat "lack".I suppose I gave the wrong idea. My conclusion isn’t to repeat the word lack; my second example was meant only to show that a compound subject is needed to use a plural verb. Besides, it’s the lack of time and enthusiasm that is the obstacle, not time and enthusiasm
BarbaraPAIt's clearly two things.But one subject. The second lack is not syntactically implied, i.e., we have a compound object, not a compound subject.
BarbaraPAThe second subject is implied.In a purely semantic analysis, yes, which is certainly a legitimate approach. However, when I think "correct", I naturally think "grammar", and from a purely syntactic point of view, the sole subject is the lack (of time and enthusiasm).