Plural forms only!

trousers, glasses.

Excellent - Woody can you think of any more?

Cattle, trousers, pants, shorts, binoculars, jeans, pyjamas, pliers.

Woodward, I can understand that 'cattle' is 'plural' because it refers to several animals, but why the other words like 'scissors' are considered 'plural'? To me they are just words that end by 's' as much they are naming things which have two parts but they are only one thing, the half of 'trousers' is nothing, the half of 'glasses' is nothing while a part of the cattle is something, and to g

I addressed Woodward but my plea is for all teachers.
Thanks.

To have a 'plural' you have to have more than a thing is not necessarily True.
Some words are considered only in a plural form. Normally before these words you can say:
a pair of glasses or a pair of trousers but in reality you are talking about one.
These are just one of the many exceptions that exist in English. The specific name of the plural...I don't know if there is a specifi

Yes, in Spanish is the same even more patent because we have plural form for the article , 'las tijeras' (the scissors)

And if I wanted to be fussy with the whims of real language I've could focused in 'cattle' rather than the other kind of plurals that , at least, have plural linguistic form as much they are expressing an only thing.

Curious thing: Greek have 'dual' form, so

Arabic has dual forms. Trying to conjugate verbs is a nightmare!

Can you speak Arabic or are you studying it?
Are there Arabic speakers in Chile? From which countries are they? It's like in Spain that there are two types of Arabic speakers? (immigrants on the one hand and on the other hand immensely rich Arabs, I think from Saudi, mostly visitors or even settled in the south of Spain)

O O O I know, mice! mice! hehe, I'm bad at these word games.. That was my best yet!