Please taking a moment to look at my text . Many thanks

Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that more government funding should be spent on preventing illness by promoting a healthy lifestyle.While I completely agree with the idea that a healthy way of living seems to be important for everyone, I do not agree that it is more vital to treat people who are ill.

On the one hand, it is necessary to spend money on prevention because of various reasons.Firstly,in the go-go years of community,more and more people lead sedentary lifestyle ,which is a major factor in health problems such as obesity and heart disease.Therefore, authorities should encourage people of all ages to take regular exercise by providing facilities in every part of community.Secondly,government plays a vital role in health awareness campaigns which be accept by everyone having a personal responsibilities to look after their own health.For example, government could support everybody to use their cars less and walk or cycle more to improve their health.

In another hand, it is more essential to focus on treatment because not all illnesses are the result of lifestyle choices by individuals,they may be the result of pollution or unhealthy living condition . As a example, lack of safe drinking water in some countries is one of the main leading problem affecting to people globally.Moreover, funding for hospitals is important so as to treat patients who are seriously ill and also to conduct vital researchers into new treatments of many life-threatening conditions, such as cancer or asthma.

In conclusion, there is thus a strong agrument in favour of spending public money for healthy lifestyle,I disagree that illness prevention should be starved of public money.