please somebody check this esssay very soon

Most of us heard about Charles Darwin who developed evolution theories which are based on the idea of the natural selection which is a process that operates on a population of organisms through its effect on individuals. Individuals may survive or die because they are better or less well adapted in a particular environment. Over time, and generations, the population will evolve as particular traits change or increase and others reduce or die out in the population as a whole. This theory expound that people are always in struggle to get food, healing, jobs and to stay alive. Some Social Darwinists claimed that some people are better than others and have more advantages because of their genetic or biological superiority. In fact, applying this theory could make many problems for societies like racism because it says that the existence will be for the strongest, unlike to what Spencer had argued "through competition, social evolution would automatically produce prosperity and personal liberty".

Firstly, social Darwinism is only some developed theories, and I think it failed because it didn't depend on direct evidences that can convince the people and the scientists. In addition, it incorporated "law of the jungle" in which the strongest race will hold its position forever, and the weakest race will hold its weakness. For example, Lions are the strongest kind of animals, and zebras are easy victims for them. By comparison, in real world, the sovereigns will not hold their positions forever even though they can hold their positions for long time. In spite of what reform Darwinists (who used Darwinism to advocate strong role for government) argued "human beings need new ideas and institutions as they adopt to changing conditions", some of them justify racist ideas that expose their exploited belief in equality.

Furthermore, social Darwinism didn't contain any solution to solve poverty, slavery and helping disabled people because it gave the right for the strongest races to do what they want, and also they shouldn't care about weak races. For instance, Spencer said "the strong, the intelligent, the wealthy should reproduce themselves". In the same way, laws must only be applied on the poor people and those who have high classes have the ability to override the laws "partly by subjecting those who remain the never - understand the conditions of existence".

In conclusion, I found that this theory can make critical problems everywhere it can be applied. It can cause problems for individuals and hamper their hope to develop as it says "we inherit our parent's tempers, our parents' conscientiousness, shyness and ability". Despite the fact that many philosophers and sociologists adopted the theory of evolution like Karl Marks who argued "it is recognizes how Darwin in beats and plants his English societies with its 'inventions' and Malthusian 'struggle for existence'", this theory proved its destructive effects many times, like what happened in world war ii when the German Nazi leader Adolf Hitler kill several millions of Jews just because they were a weak race.