You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
You should write at least 250 words.
AnswerThe phenomenon of deprivation is becoming more and more prevalent in some of the developing and undeveloped countries today, especially in time of inflation and pandemics spreading all over the world. Some people believe that it is better for developed nations to seek another methods of support to address that issue rather than raising fund. In this essay, I will give some reasons and points before reaching my final opinion.
First and foremost, for some reasons, the comtemplation on raising money for such problems will save rich nations' time but still express their caring to poorer ones. The Government in those undeveloped countries could have the right to declare how it should take advantage of that subsidy on the ground that it is the one who comprehend their country the most. For example, people could divide that money into several fields such as infrastructure, food, education and economy in order to improve them gradually.
Otherwise, it is undeniable that in some cases, money is not the most imperative solution to tackle the problem. Not only do people in poor countries have to deal with impoverishment, but they also face up to several catastrophes, unemployment, lack of pure irrigation, so on. Therefore, with the subscription from rich ones, they could not solve all those problems. In the majority of cases, it would be better if the rich tend to give the long-term objects, for instance, food, drink, garments, books or household appliances. As a result, the standard of living would be accelerated and the Government in poor countries could pay more attention to other major aspects. In European nations, the Government has operated some charities, campaigns or organisations, called for help from their residents and they donate facilities to Africa annually. Many celebrities also come there, even stay there for a month, to meet face to face and give residents their lovely gifts by themselves. It will either advocate their life a lot in the future or show the rich countries' love and caring to poorer ones.
In a nutshell, I assert that fundamental as money is, not all situations it could help. More importantly, rich nations should show their trully support and ministration to poorer ones in effort to alleviate the famine happening frequently there. To do it successfully, other types of help instead of money could be a good choice.
You wrote nearly 400 words. The minimum is 250. You will not lose points for writing more; however, longer essays generally do not get high band scores.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
You wrote nearly 400 words. The minimum is 250. You will not lose points for writing more; however, longer essays generally do not get high band scores. And there are many reasons for this.
First, the longer the essay, the more chances you have to make errors, and you will lose points for each of those errors.
Second, your writing may be repetitious and wordy. This will cost you po
The phenomenon (wrong word - most students use "phenomenon" incorrectly. It is an occurrence, usually in nature, that science cannot explain. ) of deprivation (wrong word) Hunger and starvation
First and foremost, for some reasons, the comtemplation (wrong word, wrong spelling and wrong usage) on raising money for such problems will save rich nations' time but still express their caring to poorer ones. (I have no idea if you are writing an agreement or disagreement. This is quite bad for cohesion a