Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is a positive or negative development?

Currently, academic university degrees are considered more vital than personae and hands-on experience by job recruiters when they find new applicants. The root causes are the higher chance of success of students being well-educated and the capability of saving time to train non-academic employees. From my point of view, this is a positive effect.

There are two factors led to this case. First and foremost, in this knowledge-based society, achieving formal academic degrees plays a vital role in career prospects. Formal qualifications not only help broaden students’ necessary knowledge about their future jobs but also cultivate their practical skills, such as problem-solving skills and team-working skills. For instance, in order to become an accountant, a person needs to practice in some hospitals and carry out experiments. Secondly, this trend can help job recruiters save valuable time. Specifically, they have to teach their non-academic employees how to work properly meanwhile well-educated employees do not need.

This development can be extremely positive. Undergraduates are likely to try harder if they want to have better job opportunities. Furthermore, when the demand for obtaining degrees to have a higher position in a company never ceases to grow, there will be more money invested to enhance the quality of the education system, as a result, the literacy rate will increase.

To sum up, formal degrees become the top requirement of many recruiters in this day and age. The common factors that lead to this situation are the better opportunities for students and economizing time, and the outcomes of this revolution is negative