Please review my IELTS writing task 2

The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

A suggestion stated that one government should have complete control of all nations. From my perspective, this recommendation will result in enormous benefits accompanied by drawbacks related to autonomy.

In the first place, a single government for all countries facilitates distributing resources all over the globe. Using only one currency unit may be brought about and used among different nations. Thus, the government will circulate financial resources, and international trading will become more convenient. In addition, natural resources can be exploited and provided for every country so that there are equal chances for undeveloped countries and developed ones to grow. A centralized government will be effective in acquiring human’s solidarity. In particular, all nations can solve climate change and the health crisis by obeying this government’s legislation.

Along with the advantages, initiating a universal government has downsides that outweigh its benefits. One problem occurring when establishing a single government is the differences in the political system. For example, Vietnam pursues the socialist system, while Thailand assembles a monarchy. The government may be unable to administer all nations due to this dissimilarity. Another problem is the doubt of whether this one-world government functions well. If it makes a mistake in distributing resources or passing laws, the world will be affected and confront a gigantic crisis.

In conclusion, one universal government can solve global issues but may corrupt the balance of the nations and the world. Hence, other solutions should be brought out in place of establishing this type of government.