More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, skilled migration to developed nations has become a prevalent and highly recognized phenomenon, causing some public controversy. Although this movement is considered inevitable for talented employees, in my perspective, this has attributed to the shortage of skilled workforce in many developing countries, which therefore should be prevented.
It has been suggested that less-developed economies are suffering from the lack of qualified professionals. First, as the world becomes increasingly connected, there are fewer experts, especially those in sciences and engineering, willing to remain in their countries. As a result, there would be insufficient human resources to deal with complex technical challenges, ultimately leading to lower productivity. In addition, conducive workplaces would be highly necessary to ensure the best performance for skilled employees. In fact, these less-developed countries are unlikely to afford these environments, which results in many key workers migrating to developed nations.
Besides, there are certainly more highly educated employees attracted to richer nations. First, award policies established by global enterprises will attract more talents from developing regions. For instance, many specialists become interested in foreign corporations, as they are awarded more fairly and generously. Additionally, since economy growth is largely driven by high-skilled workers, many developed countries would be motivated to steal them away from poorer ones, which contributes to brain drain. It can be implied that recruiting talented immigrants leads to many economic advantages for developed nations, thereby widening the gaps between richer and poorer regions.
In conclusion, the movement of qualified professionals should be limited to some extent, as it brings about some negative implications to developing countries. By making use of qualified workforce effectively, these nations can better advance their development.
More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree?